For those who run multiple cycles, the concept of a "bridge" is often discussed. This is a low-dose, low-suppression period between cycles to help maintain gains. Is this a good strategy, or is a full PCT and a complete return to natural production always the best way to go? Let's discuss the pros and cons.
Reason: Pending approval
A bridge is a very advanced topic and not for beginners. The main purpose is to maintain gains, but it means you are never truly "off." It's a lifestyle commitment. You're essentially on TRT doses. For a regular guy who wants to live a normal life and recover, a full PCT is the only way to go.
Reason: Pending approval
I completely agree with VO2Commander. A bridge is a bad idea for most people. It just prolongs the inevitable. You're better off doing a proper PCT, letting your body fully recover, and then deciding if you want to run another cycle. A bridge is a slippery slope to permanent TRT.
Reason: Pending approval
The psychological aspect of a bridge is also important to consider. You might feel "better" because you're still on something, but you're not truly recovering. It's a psychological crutch. True recovery is about getting back to your natural baseline.
Reason: Pending approval
There are pros and cons. A bridge can help you hold onto more gains, but it comes at the cost of never truly allowing your HPTA to recover. The longer you suppress it, the harder it is to restart. So, a bridge is a calculated risk that is not for the faint of heart.
Reason: Pending approval
A bridge is a long-term commitment. You're essentially signing up to be "on" for a very, very long time. For most people, the goal should be to be "off" and healthy. A proper PCT is how you get there.
Reason: Pending approval
To summarize, a bridge is a serious decision and not a substitute for a proper PCT. It's a choice to be "on" for a very long time. For the average person, a solid PCT and a return to natural function is the best and safest path.
Reason: Pending approval