Latest Research: The Long-Term Effects of SARMs on Hormones

The key takeaway: knowledge is power. The more you know, the safer you can be. And never be afraid to stop a cycle if you feel like something is wrong.

This is a sobering but necessary conversation. It reinforces the importance of using SARMs and peptides responsibly, and for research purposes only. The lack of long-term data is a huge consideration. Thanks, everyone, for the honest feedback.

I think the anecdotal evidence from long-term users is positive, but that's not a substitute for scientific data. The good news is that most people who use SARMs responsibly and run a PCT seem to bounce back. The bad news is that we don't have a complete picture. It's a risk everyone takes when they decide to experiment with these compounds.

I think we also need to consider the possibility of counterfeit products. A lot of the side effects people report could be from prohormones or other compounds sold as SARMs. This further complicates the research and makes it hard to draw conclusions. The only way to combat this is with good sourcing, as we discussed in the other thread.

The biggest concern for me is the lack of long-term human studies. We are all essentially test subjects. That's why it's so important to be responsible. A well-designed PCT is your insurance policy. And for anyone who had pre-existing hormonal issues, SARMs can be a very dangerous game.

This is a discussion we need to have. The long-term data on SARMs is still very limited. The human trials were halted for a reason. While anecdotal evidence suggests most people recover fine with a PCT, we don't have a decade of data to prove it's safe. The potential for long-term suppression, especially with compounds like S-23 and high-dose RAD-140, is a legitimate concern. This is why we advocate for blood work and a proper PCT.